The content is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 License.
Reviewed Article:
Shaping Minoan Clay Tablets and Hanging Nodules: Contributions from Experimental Research and X-radiography

This paper investigates the potential for experimental archaeology and X-radiography to improve our understanding of the manufacture and use of two categories of prehistoric Cretan administrative clay objects: clay tablets and hanging nodules. The results are encouraging: the simple and three-fold tablet shaping techniques can be distinguished confidently, incised writing that was erased can, potentially, be made visible again and the presence of string inside hanging nodules is clearly visible and, for the most part, can be visualised. This paper thus highlights the benefits that could be gained by treating ancient clay documents as archaeological objects and applying standard non-destructive investigative techniques to them.
Introduction
Drawing on experimental archaeology and radiography, this article investigates the potential of administrative clay objects to reveal hitherto unknown information about the palatial bureaucracy of Middle and Late Bronze Age Crete (Greece). Minoan administrative objects (e.g. clay tablets, roundels, noduli, nodules, and sealings) are iconic objects that have been studied by many scholars as epigraphic and bureaucratic documents. The focus of these investigations has almost exclusively been on the texts inscribed and the seal imagery impressed onto these objects. Some limited macroscopic and experimental work has been conducted on shaping techniques, scribal hands and archival storage arrangements, most commonly in relation to the Late Bronze Age Mycenaean Linear B tablets found on the Greek mainland and Crete (Sjöquist and Åström, 1985; 1991; Palaima, 1988; Driessen, 2000; Perna, 2017; Greco and Flouda, 2017; Judson, 2023;). Surprisingly, no project has as yet investigated these artefacts as archaeological objects in their own right, trying to understand the various stages of their chaîne opératoire - from the collection of raw materials, processing of the clay, shaping techniques, to use and deposition. This research is a first step in this direction and will allow us to cast a more intimate glance on this category of objects for the first time.
The Minoan palaces emerged in the Middle Minoan IB period and continued until their destruction in Late Minoan IB (ca. 1,900-1,500 B.C.). These widespread destructions were followed by cultural discontinuity and subsequent recovery and shift to a more 'Mycenaean' cultural horizon with Knossos as the primary palace on the island (Watrous, 1994; Rehak and Younger, 1998). Scholars assume that each palace had a substantial territory affiliated with it, over which it had some degree of authority. The palaces were both producers and consumers of raw materials, goods and services, and utilised a well-developed bureaucracy to keep track of everything that went in and out. The best-known accounting objects are clay tablets inscribed with signs in the Cretan Hieroglyphic, Linear A, or Linear B scripts. These tablets are internal records of the central palatial administration. However, there are many other administrative objects that were in use alongside tablets. For example, hanging nodules were clay lumps attached to a string with seal impressions on one or more sides. Their likely use was that of a 'label' tied to the accompanying object. Flat-based nodules were clay lumps formed around small, folded parchment sheets to create very small packages, tied with thin string. These were self-contained administrative objects with seal impressions and likely represent secret communication intended for a specific individual. Roundels are rounded clay disks with one or more seal impressions around the edge. Frequently, they are inscribed with symbols or script signs. Their precise purpose is uncertain, but these documents express some kind of interaction between an individual and the 'central administration', and probably functioned as something like a 'receipt'. Similarly, Noduli are a type of clay receipt or token with a seal impression. They are not attached to any object but are independent documents. Direct object sealings were lumps of clay pressed against a container to seal it. These containers could have been made of clay, wood, leather, et cetera. Users of these containers would indicate access privileges by impressing their stamp into the soft clay (Schoep, 1999; Finlayson, 2013; Montecchi, 2017; Weingarten, 2017).
For the purpose of this research, our focus is on clay tablets and hanging nodules as these offer the greatest potential for X-radiography. Roundels, noduli and direct object sealings, on the other hand, are small hand-formed lumps of clay which do not currently offer much scope for further insights. Flat-based nodules, akin to work done on cuneiform tablets hidden inside their clay envelope, would benefit from CT scanning to reveal the parchment void inside in 3D (The Netherland Institute for the Near East, 2018; Rolff, et al., 2020; Spataro et al., 2023).
What is X-radiography?
X-radiography is a type of electromagnetic radiation that penetrates objects in proportion to the atomic density of the materials and thickness of the object. One can then capture the outgoing radiation as a greyscale image on a photographic film or monitor. Following Röntgen's discovery of X-rays in 1896, the technology was quickly applied to medical problems. Not long after, its use started to expand into archaeological and art historical applications, such as human and animal bones, metals, ceramics, paper, paintings, and soils (for a recent summary, see Lang, et al., 2005). In relation to fired ceramics, X-rays have predominantly been used to help illuminate manufacturing methods, though it has also been shown to be a valuable tool in grouping fabrics (Berg, 2008; Berg and Ambers, 2017). Its use in pottery studies is now well established (Rye, 1977; 1981; Carr, 1990; Carr and Riddick, 1990; Berg, 2008; 2009; 2022; Romano and Zingale, 2019). More recently, scholars have started to utilise 3D CT scanners, but the high equipment prices and running costs and extended recording and digital enhancement time associated with this technology means it is unlikely to replace the inexpensive and speedy X-ray technology for some time yet (Berg, unpublished; Karl, et al., 2014; Caloi and Bernardini, 2024).
Identifying forming techniques with X-radiography: pottery and figurines
Whether investigating manufacturing techniques for pots or for figurines, the principle is the same: when motion and pressure are applied to clay objects, the orientation of voids and inclusions reflects this, revealing a recognisable and repeatable pattern for different shaping techniques which can be made visible through X-radiography. Rye (1977; 1981) was the first to demonstrate this principle for pottery in relation to pinching, drawing, coil-building, slab-building, moulding and wheel-throwing with further foundational work undertaken by Carr (1990) and Berg (2008) (See Figure 1). For an overview and best practice guide to X-radiography of pottery, see Berg and Ambers (2017). The same principles also apply to handmade figurines whose forming techniques and sequences can be revealed through X-radiography. Work on sculpted or modelled clay objects has been surprisingly rare given its great potential. Foster (1983), for example, investigated Kourion votive figures. Based on the direction of voids and inclusions, as well as the presence or absence of joins, he was able to provide a detailed manufacturing sequence for the horse and rider figures. A more recent study was undertaken by the author on human Bronze Age figurines from the Minoan Philioremos peak sanctuary. The reconstruction of the manufacturing sequence for the human figurines revealed that these figurines were made of separate lower (legs) and upper (body) parts, which were then joined together. The joint was then strengthened (and disguised) through the application of the clay loin cloth (See Figure 2). Thus, applying X-radiography to clay tablets and other administrative objects made from clay is likely to provide interesting insights into their shaping techniques. To test this hypothesis, experimental replicas were fashioned using a range of shaping techniques and then X-rayed.
Data and Methods: Experimental archaeology
Two types of administrative objects were targeted in these experiments: clay tablets and hanging nodules. We used semifine red-brown natural clay from Whalley Range in Manchester. The clay was processed by the potter Juan Ignacio Jimenez Rivero as described in Tomei and Rivero (2023: Stage 2). To visualise forming techniques more clearly with X-radiography, straw temper was added to the clay for some experiments.
Experiment 1
Replica clay tablets were made using two different shaping techniques: 1) simple and 2) folded. My experimental work is drawing on work done by Judson (2023; British School at Athens, n.d.), who investigated how Mycenaean scribes made Linear B tablets, identifying the two principal methods of simple and triple-folded tablets.
Simple tablets: |
|
Folded tablets: |
|
Table 1. Experimental shaping techniques for clay tablets.
Experiment 2
The second set of tablet experiments was designed to investigate the orientation of the voids and inclusions with the aim of helping to visualise shaping techniques better. Very little water is used in the making of clay tablets. As a result, the clay is very dense and has few air voids that would be visible on X-rays. Instead, straw was added to the clay to help visualise the orientation of inclusions after they had been shaped according to the two principal techniques. Straw has a different radiodensity from clay and is therefore easily visible on X-rays and, because straw is elongated, its shape shows the orientation of the inclusions clearly.
|
Table 2. Experimental clay tablets with straw temper added.
Experiment 3
A third set of experiments was undertaken with clay tablets to determine whether inscribed writing that had been erased by ancient scribes (and the tablet re-inscribed) could be detected with X-rays. For this experiment, a simple replica clay tablet had text inscribed into its surface with a toothpick while still wet (See Figure 3). It was then left to dry for different lengths of time before fresh clay or water was applied to the surface or the surface was smoothed with an implement to obliterate the inscription (See Figure 4). That re-inscribing took place has been confirmed by macroscopic inspection of Linear A tablets which has shown that many were, in fact, palimpsests, meaning that the original text had been erased and new text added (Schoep, 1999). In other cases, evidence is more tangential. For example, Linear B tablets were cut to a size inconsistent with the amount of writing currently visible, leading scholars to argue that the tablet size matched the original text which had been erased subsequently and over-written (Tomas, 2013). In contrast to the Minoan and Mycenaean tablets , Mesopotamian ones were rarely erased or reinscribed. Instead, scribes remoulded old tablets or soaked them in water to prepare a recycled batch of clay (Taylor, 2011). No doubt, this form of recycling also took place in Minoan Crete, though we lack evidence for it.
|
Table 3. Inscription experiments on replica clay tablets.
Experiment 4
A hanging nodule is a simple piece of hand-formed clay that is squeezed around a plain, twisted or knotted string. The great range of string-knot arrangements used in the past was revealed by Montecchi (2017) who analysed silicone casts of broken hanging nodules kept in the Corpus of Minoan and Mycenaean Seals archive and identified at least four different arrangements: 1) nodule over a single knotted end of a string; 2) nodule over the length of a single (at times knotted) string; 3) a nodule over the two loose ends of a string; and 4) a nodule over the two twisted ends of a single string. Unlike the examples in the archive which were broken, many of these administrative clay objects have been found intact with the string burnt out following an accidental fire that turned the artefact into fired ceramics. Therefore, this experimental study was performed to determine whether the type of knot (single or double), the number of strings (one, two) and their arrangement (simple, twisted, knotted) can be visualised with X-radiography non-destructively (See Figures 5-6). The clay was allowed to air-dry before X-rays were taken. Because of the different radiodensity of clay and string, one would expect the string and knot to be clearly visible on the X-ray. Future experiments may wish to investigate whether different string materials could be visualised accurately by X-ray.
|
Table 4. String experiments with clay nodules.
Data and Methods: X-ray
The X-ray machine used was a CD38 Mobile with a 1.2mm focal spot, 1m film to source distance and an Agfa cassette. The maximum exposure options are 125 kV and 50 mAs. X-ray translucent wedges were used as needed to position the objects correctly. For both clay tablets and hanging nodule replicas, two X-ray views were taken: top-down and side view. X-rays were developed and annotated using the Agfa CR30-X Developer. The resulting jpeg images were enhanced using the Adjust Colour function in Preview (Mac). For a summary on the history, theory and practice of X-radiography of archaeological ceramics, see Berg and Ambers (2017).
Replica ID | Object type | Object shape | Dimensions/cm (length:width:thickness) | Shaping technique |
1 | tablet | Palm-leaf | 18.2:3.5:0.8-0.9 | Simple |
2 | tablet | Palm-leaf | 14.3:4.6:0.9-1.7 | Triple-fold |
3 | tablet | Palm-leaf | 14.6:4.1:0.5-1.1 | Triple-fold |
10 | tablet | Palm-leaf | 16.6:3.0:0.8-1.2 | Simple |
11 | tablet | Palm-leaf | 14.0:4.8:0.4-1.9 | Triple-fold |
12 | tablet | Palm-leaf | 17.8:4.5:0.7-1.0 | Simple |
13 | tablet | Palm-leaf | 18.8:4.0:0.6-0.7 | Simple |
14 | tablet | Palm-leaf | 16.5:3.8:0.7-0.9 | Simple |
15 | tablet | Palm-leaf | 15.6:4.0:0.5-0.7 | Simple |
1.1 | tablet | Palm-leaf | 14.3:6.5:0.3-0.4 | Simple |
2.1 | tablet | Palm-leaf | 20.8:4.2:0.3-0.8 | Simple |
3.1 | tablet | Palm-leaf | 16.0:7.9:0.4-0.6 | Simple |
4.1 | tablet | Palm-leaf | 20.3:4.7:0.3-1.4 | Triple-fold |
5.1 | tablet | Palm-leaf | 18.7:4.5:0.3-0.9 | Triple-fold |
6.1 | tablet | Palm-leaf | 16.5:5.2:0.6-1.3 | Simple |
7.1 | tablet | Palm-leaf | 15.2:4.5:0.3-1.3 | Triple-fold |
8.1 | tablet | Palm-leaf | 25.8:4.0:0.4-1.0 | Simple |
9.1 | tablet | Palm-leaf | 27.5:3.2:0.3-08 | Simple |
20 | nodule | 4.0:2.6:1.4-1.6 | Hand-formed | |
21 | nodule | 4.0:2.1:1.0-1.4 | Hand-formed | |
22 | nodule | 4.5:3.8:1.0-1.3 | Hand-formed | |
23 | nodule | 3.9:2.0:0.9-1.1 | Hand-formed | |
24 | nodule | 4.0:2.5:0.9-1.3 | Hand-formed | |
25 | nodule | 3.5:2.0:0.9-1.3 | Hand-formed |
Table 5. Key information about replica tablets and hanging nodules.
Discussion
Tablet shaping techniques
X-rays are easily able to distinguish between simple and folded tablets both in the top-down view and the side view (See Figures 7-10). The air spaces between the folds are clearly visible in the side view and the unevenness of the tablet thickness is visible in the top-down view. In contrast, the simple tablet is characterised by a coherent thickness throughout and an absence of joints or voids.
Among the simple tablets, the directional pressure of the rolling pin is only visible, if it is only exerted in one direction without subsequent correction, and pressure is applied to cause thickness differences that are made visible in the X-ray (See Figures 11-12). The same applies to tablets made by applying palm pressure: when done in such a way as to result in thickness differences, then these are visible on the X-ray (Figure 13). If thickness differences are not obliterated by subsequent actions, rolling pin activity and palm pressure can be distinguished by the shape of their imprint into clay: a rolling pin applies consistent pressure across the width of the tablet (Figures 11-12), whereas a palm print exerts greater pressure in the centre than the edges (See Figure 13). Whether or not the clay ball was first shaped into a coil cannot be detected by X-ray.
As regards folded tablets, the multiple folding actions and the subsequent smoothing of the edges and joints make it difficult to detect directionality of the rolling pin. No pattern can easily be discerned on the X-ray (See Figure 10). Whether or not the clay ball was first shaped into a coil cannot be detected by X-ray.
Orientation of inclusions
The top-down X-ray view of the simple tablet shows a random orientation of the straw inclusions and a parallel alignment to the surface for the side view (See Figures 14-15). This is entirely in line with what we would expect based on our knowledge of pottery-forming techniques. The physical pressures exerted when making a tablet are similar to mould-made or pinched pots, which show an equivalent orientation in X-rays (See Figure 1). The top-down view of the folded tablet also shows a random orientation of the straw inclusions. Unfortunately, the side view is difficult to interpret due to the various folding layers (See Figures 16-17).
Detecting tablet inscriptions
When the clay was wet, inscribed text could easily be obliterated and the X-ray shows no trace of the original inscription as the clay was sufficiently malleable to fill the incised gaps (See Figures 3, 18). However, when a tablet has dried to the leather hard stage, the application of water or wet clay may not penetrate the spaces sufficiently well to erase the original inscription completely when viewed on an X-ray, even though the tablet may appear entirely void of text to the naked eye (See Figures 19-20). Since we know that the Minoans practised tablet recycling, there remains a potential of X-rays to detect erased ancient text on reused clay tablets.
Hanging nodules shaping techniques and string arrangements
As expected, the existence of string and knot is clearly visible on the X-rays (and would be equally visible if the string had burnt out from exposure to fire and had left a void behind) (See Figures 5-6, 21-22). The frequency of knotting is hard to discern and it impossible to distinguish double knots from single knots. Twisted string can be visualised satisfactorily. Thus, the experiments have shown the potential of X-radiography in revealing the 'content' of intact hanging nodules.
Conclusions
Replica experiments have demonstrated the great potential of X-radiography to 'see through' ancient administrative objects and visualise information that is otherwise unknown: tablet forming techniques, erased writing on clay tablets and string arrangements for hanging nodules. Being a non-destructive technique, X-rays are easy and quick to take and can reveal much about past administrative practice that is currently hidden.
Keywords
Country
- Greece
Bibliography
Berg, I., 2008. Looking through Pots: Recent Advances in Ceramics X-radiography. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, pp.1177-1188.
Berg, I., 2009. X-radiography of Knossian Bronze Age Vessels: Assessing our Knowledge of Primary Forming Techniques. Annual of the British School at Athens, 104, pp.137-173.
Berg, I., 2022. The relationship between inclusion/void orientation and speed in wheel-thrown pots. Journal of Archaeological Science, 148, 105685.
Berg, I and J. Ambers, 2017. X-Radiography of archaeological ceramics. In: A. Hunt, ed. Handbook of Archaeological Ceramic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp.544-564.
British School at Athens, n.d. How to make a Linear B tablet, A.P. Judson. [video online] Available at: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7kHp6JUYx4> [Accessed 21 August 2024].
Caloi, I. and Bernardini, F., 2024. Revealing primary forming techniques in wheel-made ceramics with X-ray microCT. Journal of Archaeological Science, 169, 106025.
Carr, C., 1990. Advances in Ceramic Radiography and Analysis: Applications and Potentials. Journal of Archaeological Science, 17, pp.13-34.
Carr, C. and Riddick, E.B.Jr., 1990. Advances in Ceramic Radiography and Analysis: Laboratory Methods. Journal of Archaeological Science, 17, pp.35-66.
Driessen, J., 2000. The Scribes of the Room of the Chariot Tablets at Knossos: Interdisciplinary approach to the study of a Linear B deposit. Minos Supplement 15. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.
Finlayson, S., 2013. Form follows function: writing and its supports in the Aegean Bronze Age. In: K.E. Piquette and R.D. Whitehouse, eds. Writing as material practice: substance, surface and medium. London: Ubiquity Press, pp.123-142.
Foster, F.V., 1983. Kourion Votive Figures: A Study Using Xeroradiography. MASCA,2, pp.179-181.
Greco, A. and Flouda, G., 2017. The Linear B pa-i-to Epigraphic Project. Annuario della Scuola Archeologica di Atene e delle Missioni Italiane in Oriente, 95, pp.143-160.
Judson, A.P., 2023. The tablet-makers of Pylos: an experimental investigation into the production of Linear B tablets. Annual of the British School at Athens, 118, pp.147-170.
Karl, S., Jungblut, D., Mara, H., Wittum, G. and Krömker, S., 2014. Insight into manufacturing techniques of archaeological pottery: industrial X-ray computed tomography as a tool in the examination of cultural material. In: M. Martinón-Torres, ed. Craft and science: International perspectives on archaeological ceramics. Doha, Qatar: Bloomsbury Qatar Foundation, pp.253-261.
Lang, J., Middleton, A., Ambers. J. and Higgin, T., 2005. Radiographic Images. In: J. Lang and A. Middleton, eds. Radiography of Cultural Material. London: Elsevier. pp.20-48.
Montecchi, B., 2017. Classification, use and function of hanging nodules in the Neopalatial administrative practices (Minoan Crete). Archäologischer Anzeiger, pp.1-18.
Palaima, T.G., 1988. The Scribes of Pylos. Incunabula Graeca, 87. Roma: Edizioni dell'Ateneo.
Perna, M., 2017. Administrative documents without writing: the case of sealings and flat-based nodules. In: A.M. Jasink, J. Weingarten and S. Ferrara, eds. Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and Surrounding Areas. Firenze: Firenze University Press. pp.73-80.
Rehak, P. and Younger, J.G., 1998. Review of Aegean Prehistory VII: Neopalatial, Final Palatial and Post-palatial Crete. American Journal of Archaeology, 102, pp.91-173.
Rolff, T., Rautenhaus, M., Olbrich, S. and Frintrop, S. 2020. Segmenting Computer-Tomographic Scans of Ancient Clay Artefacts for Visual Analysis of Cuneiform Inscriptions. In: J. Krüger, M Niessner and J. Stückler, eds. Vision, Modelling, and Visualisation. no place: The Eurographics Association, pp.29-37.
Romano, L. and Zingale, M., 2019. Area I Pottery - Part 1. Typology, Technology and Use. In: L. Romano and F. D'Agostino, eds. Abu Tbeirah Excavations I. Area 1. Last Phase and Building A - Phase 1. Collana Materiali e Documenti 44. Rome: Sapienza University Press. pp.323-370.
Rye, O.S., 1977. Pottery Manufacturing Techniques: X-Ray Studies. Archaeometry, 19, pp.205-211.
Rye, O.S., 1981. Pottery Technology. Principles and Reconstruction. Manuals on Archeology. Washington: Taraxacum.
Spataro, M., Taylor, J. and O'Flynn, D., 2023. A technological study of Assyrian clay tablets from Nineveh, Tell Halaf and Nimrud: A Pilot Case Study. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 15, 68.
Schoep, I., 1999. Tablets and territories? Reconstructing Late Minoan IB political geography through undeciphered documents. American Journal of Archaeology, 103, pp.201-221.
Sjöquist, K.-E. and Åström, P., 1985. Pylos: Palmprints and Palmleaves. Gothenburg: Åströms Förlag.
Sjöquist, K.-E. and Åström, P., 1991. Knossos: Keepers and Kneaders. Gothenburg: Åströms Förlag.
Taylor, J., 2011. Tablets as Artefacts, Scribes as Artisans. In: K. Radner and E. Robson, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Cuneiform Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp.5-31.
The Netherland Institute for the Near East (NINO), 2018. Seeing through clay: 4000 year old tablets in hypermodern CT scanner. Available at: <https://www.nino-leiden.nl/message/seeing-through-clay-4000-year-old-ta…; [Accessed 21 August 2024].
Tomas, H., 2013. Saving on clay: the Linear B practice of cutting tablets. In: K.E. Piquette and R.D. Whitehouse, eds. Writing as material practice: substance, surface and medium. London: Ubiquity Press. pp.175-191.
Tomei, F. and Rivero, J.I.J., 2023. Experimenting with the ancient Greek pottery production process from clay selection to firing in a (re)constructed updraft kiln. EXARC, 3, 88735/10700.
Watrous, V., 1994. Review of Aegean Prehistory III: Crete from earliest prehistory through the Protopalatial period. American Journal of Archaeology, 98, pp.695-753
Weingarten, J., 2017. When one equals one: the Minoan roundel. In: A.M. Jasink, J. Weingarten and S. Ferrara, eds. Non-scribal communication media in the Bronze Age Aegean and Surrounding Areas. Firenze: Firenze University Press. pp.98-108.